Investigative Series Questions Integrity of Rebecca Grossman Murder Prosecution

A series of investigative articles by veteran journalist Cece Woods of The Current Report is raising significant questions about the prosecution of Rebecca Grossman, who was convicted of murder in the 2020 traffic collision that killed two children. Woods has published 15 articles examining how the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department handled evidence, investigation, and the narrative that led to Grossman's conviction and sentencing of 15 years to life.

The reporting identifies key questions about missing and suppressed evidence, procedural fairness, selective prosecution, and the role of media and politics in a case tried as murder rather than a tragic traffic accident. One central question involves why the District Attorney's Office delayed filing charges against Grossman until December 29, 2020, three months after the accident and weeks after District Attorney George Gascón took office, raising concerns about political timing.

Additional concerns center on why prosecutors bypassed or excluded potentially exculpatory testimony that former major-league baseball pitcher Scott Erickson was driving a vehicle ahead of Grossman that night. Investigators also never conducted DNA testing on the front bumper of Grossman's car, which may have held important information about whether both children were struck by her car or a vehicle driven by Erickson.

Critical pieces of physical evidence, including a fog light cover and a license plate frame that did not match Grossman's Mercedes, were documented as missing from the crash-site evidence chain despite pointing to the involvement of another vehicle. Prosecutors also changed legal theories, denying racing in Erickson's misdemeanor hearing yet invoking a racing narrative in Grossman's trial without full disclosure of those changes to the jury.

Internal records, depositions and coroner's documents obtained by The Current Report revealed concealed misconduct, raising questions about whether the Sheriff's Office and DA's Office will be held accountable. The answers to these questions hold substantial implications not only for Grossman but also for public trust in how justice is administered in high-profile cases.

The Current Report has urged independent review of the Grossman investigation and prosecution by oversight bodies, including LA County's inspector-general or a court-appointed special master, to assess whether due-process safeguards were met. The platform also calls for public release of relevant internal records, investigative files, missing evidence logs, and prosecutorial decisions to allow further scrutiny at https://www.thecurrentreport.com.

Open hearings are needed to determine why key evidence was missing, why certain witnesses and testimony were omitted or changed, and how investigator fitness and credibility were evaluated in this case. The implications extend beyond this specific prosecution to broader questions about transparency and accountability in the justice system, particularly when cases attract national attention and involve complex evidence chains.

For the legal community, these revelations may prompt renewed examination of prosecutorial discretion and evidence preservation protocols. For the public, they raise fundamental questions about whether high-profile cases receive different procedural treatment than less visible matters. The investigation's findings suggest systemic issues that could affect numerous cases if similar practices exist across departments.

Cece Woods's work, including multiple deep-dives into Los Angeles County law-enforcement and public-corruption matters, has drawn national attention through her platform at https://www.thelocalmalibu.com. The questions raised in this series demand answers that could reshape how similar cases are investigated and prosecuted in the future, with potential ripple effects across California's justice system and beyond.