Mental Health Advocates Push for Electroshock Therapy Ban in Florida
TL;DR
Advantage: Awareness of ECT dangers empowers citizens to demand safer mental health treatments.
How: ECT administers electricity to induce seizures, claimed to 'reset' brain function but lacks evidence of safety.
Better World: Advocacy for banning ECT promotes mental health rights and seeks safer, proven treatments.
Interesting: Shock therapy's controversial history and risks highlight ongoing need for informed consent and safer alternatives.
Found this article helpful?
Share it with your network and spread the knowledge!
Mental health advocates are intensifying their campaign to ban electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in Florida, highlighting significant concerns about the procedure's safety and long-term neurological impacts. The Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) argues that the treatment, which involves administering electrical shocks to the brain, poses substantial risks to patients, especially children.
Current statistics reveal that approximately 100,000 people annually receive ECT in the United States, with practitioners claiming the procedure can 'reset' brain function. However, advocates point out critical gaps in scientific understanding, noting that medical professionals cannot conclusively explain how or why the treatment works.
The potential side effects of ECT are particularly alarming. Patients have reported severe memory loss, confusion, nerve pain, and increased suicide risk. One expert, Ron Bassman, who personally experienced shock therapy, notes that memory recovery is unpredictable, with some cognitive fragments permanently lost.
Legal and medical experts argue that the procedure lacks comprehensive safety validation. The FDA has not mandated clinical studies proving ECT's effectiveness, despite the treatment involving up to 460 volts of electricity through a patient's brain. Critics like attorney Jim Gottstein describe the procedure as potentially causing progressive brain damage and providing only temporary symptomatic relief.
The most contentious aspect of the advocacy group's argument centers on the treatment's use with young children. The revelation that children under five are receiving electroshock therapy has particularly galvanized public concern about psychiatric practices and patient protection.
CCHR's Florida chapter president, Diane Stein, emphasizes the urgent need to reevaluate mental health treatment protocols, arguing that current approaches prioritize pharmaceutical and invasive interventions over understanding root causes of psychological distress.
Curated from 24-7 Press Release
