ADAP Advocacy Releases Infographics Highlighting Hospital CEO Compensation Concerns in 340B Drug Pricing Program
TL;DR
ADAP Advocacy's report reveals how hospital CEOs gain unfair financial advantages by diverting 340B program funds meant for patient care into excessive executive compensation packages.
ADAP Advocacy published infographics showing how the 340B Drug Pricing Program's $66 billion in manufacturer rebates are systematically redirected from patient services to fund hospital CEO compensation packages.
ADAP Advocacy's findings expose how excessive hospital CEO pay compromises the 340B program's mission to provide healthcare access for poor patients and vulnerable communities.
ADAP Advocacy's infographics reveal that hospital CEO compensation grew exponentially after hospitals became eligible for the 340B program originally designed to help poor patients.
Found this article helpful?
Share it with your network and spread the knowledge!

The ADAP Advocacy organization has released a two-part infographic series examining executive compensation practices within hospitals participating in the 340B Drug Pricing Program. These visual resources, published as part of the organization's 340B Project, highlight concerns about how manufacturer rebates intended for patient care are being diverted to fund substantial compensation packages for hospital executives.
The first infographic, titled '340B Too Big to Fail – Executive Compensation – Part 1,' focuses on the significant pay disparity between hospital CEOs and frontline nursing staff. It emphasizes that the 340B Program was originally designed to help low-income patients access essential healthcare services, yet despite the program's growth to $66 billion in scale, these funds are increasingly being used to support excessive executive compensation rather than direct patient care.
The second component, '340B Too Big to Fail – Executive Compensation – Part 2,' demonstrates how CEO compensation has experienced exponential growth following hospitals' eligibility to participate in the 340B Program. This trend raises questions about whether the program is fulfilling its original mission of supporting vulnerable patient populations or has become a mechanism for enriching healthcare executives.
These infographics are available for public access through the organization's publications portal at https://www.adapadvocacy.org/publications.html#i and form part of ADAP Advocacy's broader national advocacy campaign questioning whether the 340B Drug Pricing Program has become 'too big to fail.'
The implications of these findings extend across multiple sectors of the healthcare industry. For patients, particularly those from low-income backgrounds who rely on 340B-supported services, these compensation practices could mean reduced access to medications and healthcare services that the program was designed to provide. Healthcare providers may face increased scrutiny regarding their use of 340B funds and their commitment to serving vulnerable populations.
For policymakers and regulatory bodies, these infographics highlight potential systemic issues within the 340B Program that may require additional oversight or reform. The pharmaceutical industry, which provides the manufacturer rebates that fund the program, may also need to reconsider their participation if funds are not reaching intended patient populations. The broader healthcare community faces questions about transparency and accountability in how federal drug discount programs are administered and whether current practices align with the program's original charitable purpose.
Curated from 24-7 Press Release

