KeyCrew Media, a real estate intelligence and media company, is meeting with members of Congress and their staff in Washington, D.C., as part of the News/Media Alliance's 2026 Support Journalism Fly-In. The company is joining more than 220 participants from news, magazine, and digital-only publishers to press for legislation that protects how journalistic content is used by AI companies. KeyCrew Media licenses its own content broadly, including to AI platforms, so its support for stronger protections may seem surprising. However, the company sees no conflict, arguing that every publisher should have the legal right to decide how its work is used.
The fly-in has two purposes: celebrating congressional champions of the news industry and meeting with lawmakers to reinforce the need for legislation that supports quality journalism. KeyCrew's focus is on clear rules for how AI companies can use publishers' content. The company advocates for properly defining how content is used, distributed, and consumed by AI platforms. That position stems from its own business model, which relies on a legal framework governing what the company and third parties can and cannot do with its reporting.
According to Steve Marcinuk, Co-Founder and CEO of KeyCrew Media, the issue is not that AI companies use news content but how some of that use happens. "There's a real risk right now that large tech companies are using information without proper licensing, building solutions on the back of work done by local organizations, with no compensation, no oversight, and no responsibility," said Marcinuk. Many AI platforms were built and trained on content that was not properly sourced, leaving publishers to enforce their preferences going forward. "How individual publications set up and enforce their rights over what can and can't be done with their content is a technology question, in terms of putting the right solutions in place to prevent scraping," said Marcinuk. "But it's also a legal one, and that part is of great importance." Technology can help block unauthorized scraping, but it cannot settle who has the right to decide; that is where legislation comes in.
KeyCrew is more open about AI use than many traditional publishers. Marcinuk says that openness is a choice, and the ability to make that choice is exactly what the fly-in is meant to protect. "We've made a conscious choice to be very open about where our content can be used and distributed. We've spent a lot of time, energy, and money setting up the right legal framework to make that possible, including licensing to AI companies and other downstream partners," said Marcinuk. "But let's not confuse concepts. That is us expressing our choice for what is done with our content, the same way other publications should be able to enforce their rights about what can and can't be done with theirs." He also pushes back on the idea that publishers seeking protections want to shut AI out entirely. Many publishers KeyCrew has met through the News/Media Alliance already license content to AI companies, with legal structures and clear terms on how content is used, displayed, and compensated.
More people now get information through AI platforms, and AI companies are consuming more content than ever. Marcinuk sees this as the moment for media companies to be at the center of decisions about how their content is and is not used. The outcome matters beyond publishers' revenue. When local organizations cannot control or be paid for their work, fewer can afford to keep producing it, affecting readers, subscribers, and their ability to operate well into the future. For KeyCrew, which interviews local experts across hundreds of real estate markets and provides that coverage to publishers filling gaps in their local reporting, a healthy media ecosystem is part of its own foundation. Clear legal protections give every publisher the ability to choose its own path with AI, whether that means broad licensing like KeyCrew's or tighter limits.
